No, I don’t mean Coke. I’m referring to the stock market rally, now 45 days old and not falling apart, despite considerable bad news and a pretty crummy earnings season. Could we finally be in the early stages of a new bull market, rather than one of those head-fake rallies that we most recently saw in late November to early January?
One of the characteristics of a new bull market is that most investors don’t recognize it until it is well underway. After a “normal” bear market, it typically takes an up move of 25–35% before the majority of investors realize that the lows are history. After this record-setting global collapse, one might expect investors to be even more cynical, requiring a 35–50% rally before most of them become believers. By then, of course, the easy money will have been made.
As this rally ages, and the lows and panic of early March fade further into the past, I continue to see signs that this one will stick. Little by little, several professional investors with excellent track records, and whose opinions I value, are saying that it’s becoming safer to buy stocks, and are putting their remaining cash to work. Some who were extremely bearish in March are turning bullish. At the same time, the vast majority of investors, both professionals and amateurs, are doubting the rally, keeping their funds in cash or bonds, and waiting for the market to drop 20% or more. They may have a very long wait.
Investor sentiment surveys are especially revealing. Two I follow are Investor’s Intelligence (a survey of investment newsletter writers) and the AAII Investment Survey (of individual investors). Both were extremely bearish in early March, with the AAII survey hitting a low not seen for at least 18 years. Since then, sentiment has understandably improved, but is still only slightly better than it was last fall, when the world seemed certain to end. In other words, most investors remain bearish despite a 25% jump in stock prices over just 6 weeks. This suggests that the “wall of worry” remains solid, which is a bullish sign.
The overall market is acting well, with virtually every sector participating in the recovery. More importantly, economically sensitive sectors, including technology, materials, industrials and consumer discretionary stocks, have been outperforming defensive sectors such as utilities, healthcare and consumer staples. This is an indication that some investors are looking forward to the economic recovery and are becoming more willing to take on risk. All of this bodes well for a continued financial and economic recovery.
This week was the first in 7 that stocks lost ground, but only a little. In fact, there has not been a drop of more than –5% since the rally began. This is typical of early bull markets, as investors with lots of cash wait in vain for that big pullback so that they can invest near the lows. But that big pullback rarely comes. Here’s an explanation from SITR Research:
“... at the start of a new bull market move, rarely will the market accommodate those investors [who are waiting for a big drop]. Our good friends at Ned Davis Research did a historical study of market pull backs at the start of new bull markets. The conclusion: the pull backs are small, typically way under double digits.
“The logic is simple; investors have hordes of cash by the end of a bear market cycle. Unfortunately most of that was raised right near the end of the bear market, which has to happen to make it the end—investor panic.... So, we have investors sitting with cash, saw the market rally, and wishing that they had invested some of their money near the low several weeks ago.
“They are now hoping for a pullback to put some of that cash to work. So when the pullback starts, there are always just a few who get anxious, and start nibbling and buying before the pullback gets very large. That little bit of buying attracts other buyers who had been sitting on the sidelines also, and the combination keeps the pullbacks small and shallow.”
Currently, we appear to be in a period of “consolidation,” when the major averages start trading in a relatively narrow range as individual stocks gyrate more wildly. Such periods can last several weeks or more, and are great times to put money into stocks and other “risky” investments. The market doesn’t run away from you, but at the same time, the movements of individual stocks relative to each other can enable one to take advantage of temporary pricing anomalies. The goal is to sell those stocks that become temporarily overvalued and buy those that are temporarily undervalued: an ideal time to rebalance portfolios. (I can’t promise the market won’t continue to rise strongly during the rebalancing process, but that’s still OK.)
Some of you have already received your new portfolio proposals, and the rest of you will over the next week or so. (Each portfolio is customized, so I can’t do them all at once.) I invite questions, both general and specific. I can’t know where you’re confused or disagree with me unless you tell me.
One additional point that I can’t emphasize enough: the financial markets always recover well before the economy. And the general public doesn’t start feeling good until many months, or even years, after the economy has bottomed. By the time Joe and Jane Main Street realize the recession is over, and the press prints mostly good news, half or even two-thirds of the bull market is already behind us. The prices of stocks and other assets are not rising now because things are good or even improving, but because the “smart money” can finally conceive of an end to this recession and financial crisis.
Friday, April 24, 2009
Friday, April 10, 2009
A New World Record
As a brief aside before resuming the portfolio email series, I would like to answer a query I’ve received from more than a few people. In the midst of the most powerful stock market rally since 1933, many are still wondering, “How low can it go?” In other words, if March 9 was not the ultimate low for this bear market, what’s the worst that could happen if the bottom is ahead of us rather than behind?
As you know, I’ve often used history as a guide. In that context, I’ve said that 2008–2009 has been the second worst bear market ever, exceeded only by the one in 1929–1932. Using that massive decline as the model, if the economy today were to become as awful as it was in 1932 (highly unlikely), we could be looking at another drop of more than –50%. Scary, yes. But there are two big problems with this comparison.
The first is that the 1929–1932 bear market was unique in taking stocks from extremely overvalued to extremely undervalued in a single 3-year decline. Normally, this process takes 10 years or more. For example, during the “lost decade” prior to this one, stock valuations peaked in 1968 and did not bottom until 1982, a period of 14 years.
The most recent valuation peak was in March 2000. If March 2009 marked the valuation low for this cycle, then the process took a total of 9 years, faster than average but far less than in the 1930s. The 1929–1932 debacle was really 2 powerful bear markets combined into one, and thus should have been roughly twice as severe as this one or the recent 2000–2003 decline. On the basis of this analysis, the current decline could already be over.
There’s yet a second flaw in using the US market decline in 1929–1932 as a model. Like today, the financial and economic crisis of the 1930s was worldwide, starting in the US and subsequently spreading overseas. But the US suffered disproportionately back then, both in the scale of its stock market decline and in the depth of its depression. This time, the pain is spread relatively evenly, with economic and market declines of roughly similar magnitude in a large number of countries. Thus, a better comparison to today’s market would be a global stock index, specifically the MSCI World index of 23 developed countries.
A global comparison also makes sense because the US represents a much smaller proportion of worldwide GDP and stock market capitalization today than in the 1930s (even without counting the emerging markets that aren’t included in the MSCI World index). So on a global basis, how does today’s bear market compare with others?
Until February 27 of this year, the 1929–1932 bear market was still the worst in world history, with a –54% decline in the MSCI World index after inflation. But on that day, the world record was officially broken. By the time the decline hit bottom on March 9, 2009, the MSCI World index had dropped a stunning –57.8% from its peak on October 31, 2007. Those of us alive today can now say that we’ve lived through the most severe bear market in world history!
Based on this analysis, what does history tell us about the ultimate low? It at least suggests that we’ve already been there, having exceeded the previous record drop. There is no reason (at least on the basis of history) to believe that global stock markets need drop any more from here. The knowledge that we made market history in 2009 is simultaneously sobering and encouraging.
In sum, history supports the notion that we have seen the lows. Valuation analysis comes to the same conclusion (see my email of March 10, “Are stocks cheap yet?”), as does investor sentiment. So even though the bad news is far from over, and the market will continue to behave badly from time to time, the worst may finally be behind us. I’m actually starting to think 2009 will be the best year for stocks since 2003. We’ll know for sure in less than 9 months.
As you know, I’ve often used history as a guide. In that context, I’ve said that 2008–2009 has been the second worst bear market ever, exceeded only by the one in 1929–1932. Using that massive decline as the model, if the economy today were to become as awful as it was in 1932 (highly unlikely), we could be looking at another drop of more than –50%. Scary, yes. But there are two big problems with this comparison.
The first is that the 1929–1932 bear market was unique in taking stocks from extremely overvalued to extremely undervalued in a single 3-year decline. Normally, this process takes 10 years or more. For example, during the “lost decade” prior to this one, stock valuations peaked in 1968 and did not bottom until 1982, a period of 14 years.
The most recent valuation peak was in March 2000. If March 2009 marked the valuation low for this cycle, then the process took a total of 9 years, faster than average but far less than in the 1930s. The 1929–1932 debacle was really 2 powerful bear markets combined into one, and thus should have been roughly twice as severe as this one or the recent 2000–2003 decline. On the basis of this analysis, the current decline could already be over.
There’s yet a second flaw in using the US market decline in 1929–1932 as a model. Like today, the financial and economic crisis of the 1930s was worldwide, starting in the US and subsequently spreading overseas. But the US suffered disproportionately back then, both in the scale of its stock market decline and in the depth of its depression. This time, the pain is spread relatively evenly, with economic and market declines of roughly similar magnitude in a large number of countries. Thus, a better comparison to today’s market would be a global stock index, specifically the MSCI World index of 23 developed countries.
A global comparison also makes sense because the US represents a much smaller proportion of worldwide GDP and stock market capitalization today than in the 1930s (even without counting the emerging markets that aren’t included in the MSCI World index). So on a global basis, how does today’s bear market compare with others?
Until February 27 of this year, the 1929–1932 bear market was still the worst in world history, with a –54% decline in the MSCI World index after inflation. But on that day, the world record was officially broken. By the time the decline hit bottom on March 9, 2009, the MSCI World index had dropped a stunning –57.8% from its peak on October 31, 2007. Those of us alive today can now say that we’ve lived through the most severe bear market in world history!
Based on this analysis, what does history tell us about the ultimate low? It at least suggests that we’ve already been there, having exceeded the previous record drop. There is no reason (at least on the basis of history) to believe that global stock markets need drop any more from here. The knowledge that we made market history in 2009 is simultaneously sobering and encouraging.
In sum, history supports the notion that we have seen the lows. Valuation analysis comes to the same conclusion (see my email of March 10, “Are stocks cheap yet?”), as does investor sentiment. So even though the bad news is far from over, and the market will continue to behave badly from time to time, the worst may finally be behind us. I’m actually starting to think 2009 will be the best year for stocks since 2003. We’ll know for sure in less than 9 months.
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Great March, Crummy Quarter, but better times ahead
True to it’s name, March came in like a lion and went out like a lamb. After continuing its recent tumble that began in early January, the MSCI ACWI (All-Country World Index) hit a bear market low on March 9 that was –58.4% below the all-time high set on Oct. 31, 2007. The magnitude of the drop makes this the most severe bear market since 1932. At its low, stocks were as cheap by most measures as they have ever been (as I discussed in a prior email). If the March 9 level holds (and it’s looking increasingly likely to me that it will), then it could well mark the low point for stocks in the 21st century.
Then, on March 10, global stock markets embarked on their most powerful rally since 1938, rising +22.6% in only 12 trading days before settling back a bit (although as of today’s close, we’re back up to the March highs). For the month of March, the MSCI ACWI rose +8.2%, reducing its loss for the first quarter to –10.7%. This was clearly crummy, but still better than the stunning loss of –22.4% during the 4th quarter of 2008.
So where do we go from here? Have stocks really hit their lows for this cycle? Is it finally time to start buying again? Obviously, I wish I knew for sure. And although I don’t, the character of this rally makes me feel like it is finally the real thing, a rally that will eventually (over 4 or 5 years) take stocks to new highs. My reasons are many, and include: 1) fundamental factors, such as the extremely low valuations seen on March 9; 2) technical factors, such as the divergence between the level of stock indexes during the decline and the number of stocks hitting new lows, and decreasing volume on down days with increasing volume on up days; 3) sentiment, which is still very low despite the rally, with most investors doubting its staying power and believing that even lower lows lay ahead; and 4) economic factors, which suggest that the rate of economic decline is slowing, and that an end to this recession may finally be in sight.
This rally, if I am right, is likely to humble both the bulls and the bears. The bulls will be humbled because real bull market rallies move upward in fits and starts, with many scary drops (such as the one we saw on Monday) that make one question the rally and potentially sell out prematurely. Countertrend rallies, on the other hand, tend to move almost straight up, rekindling a false optimism among investors. Bears will be humbled because in waiting in vain for those lower lows, they will miss out on a big portion of the rise, not investing until it’s clear that the prior lows are but a distant memory. Most investors will not, as they mistakenly believe, get back in at a level lower than that at which they sold. More likely, they won’t reinvest until stocks are some 20% to 40% higher than their exit points.
For those who might be concerned, I definitely don’t think it’s too late to load up on stocks. Based on yesterday’s close, and a historical average of 5 years for stocks to return to prior highs, one could reasonably expect an average annual return of around 17% per year through 2014. Certainly not bad, and significantly better than most competing investments. (Obviously, this is a projection, not a guarantee.)
Thus, if we’re really past the worst of this epoch-making bear market, and it’s not too late to fully invest in equities, it makes sense to re-allocate portfolios. Toward this end, I now plan to start re-allocating portfolios to prepare for the next phase of the economic cycle. This process should take about 2 months. During that time, I will be writing a series of emails explaining: 1) my portfolio construction process; 2) my short-term and long-term expectations for the global economy, corporate earnings and asset valuations; 3) my specific rationale for stock, bond, country and industry allocations; and 4) my choice of specific securities and the reasons for those choices.
I will also be contacting each of you individually to discuss your personal portfolio recommendations, which will be customized within the broader parameters to be outlined in the emails. More than ever before, it’s crucial that we’re each on the same page going forward, as the future is even more unknowable than usual.
Here’s to a brighter future
Then, on March 10, global stock markets embarked on their most powerful rally since 1938, rising +22.6% in only 12 trading days before settling back a bit (although as of today’s close, we’re back up to the March highs). For the month of March, the MSCI ACWI rose +8.2%, reducing its loss for the first quarter to –10.7%. This was clearly crummy, but still better than the stunning loss of –22.4% during the 4th quarter of 2008.
So where do we go from here? Have stocks really hit their lows for this cycle? Is it finally time to start buying again? Obviously, I wish I knew for sure. And although I don’t, the character of this rally makes me feel like it is finally the real thing, a rally that will eventually (over 4 or 5 years) take stocks to new highs. My reasons are many, and include: 1) fundamental factors, such as the extremely low valuations seen on March 9; 2) technical factors, such as the divergence between the level of stock indexes during the decline and the number of stocks hitting new lows, and decreasing volume on down days with increasing volume on up days; 3) sentiment, which is still very low despite the rally, with most investors doubting its staying power and believing that even lower lows lay ahead; and 4) economic factors, which suggest that the rate of economic decline is slowing, and that an end to this recession may finally be in sight.
This rally, if I am right, is likely to humble both the bulls and the bears. The bulls will be humbled because real bull market rallies move upward in fits and starts, with many scary drops (such as the one we saw on Monday) that make one question the rally and potentially sell out prematurely. Countertrend rallies, on the other hand, tend to move almost straight up, rekindling a false optimism among investors. Bears will be humbled because in waiting in vain for those lower lows, they will miss out on a big portion of the rise, not investing until it’s clear that the prior lows are but a distant memory. Most investors will not, as they mistakenly believe, get back in at a level lower than that at which they sold. More likely, they won’t reinvest until stocks are some 20% to 40% higher than their exit points.
For those who might be concerned, I definitely don’t think it’s too late to load up on stocks. Based on yesterday’s close, and a historical average of 5 years for stocks to return to prior highs, one could reasonably expect an average annual return of around 17% per year through 2014. Certainly not bad, and significantly better than most competing investments. (Obviously, this is a projection, not a guarantee.)
Thus, if we’re really past the worst of this epoch-making bear market, and it’s not too late to fully invest in equities, it makes sense to re-allocate portfolios. Toward this end, I now plan to start re-allocating portfolios to prepare for the next phase of the economic cycle. This process should take about 2 months. During that time, I will be writing a series of emails explaining: 1) my portfolio construction process; 2) my short-term and long-term expectations for the global economy, corporate earnings and asset valuations; 3) my specific rationale for stock, bond, country and industry allocations; and 4) my choice of specific securities and the reasons for those choices.
I will also be contacting each of you individually to discuss your personal portfolio recommendations, which will be customized within the broader parameters to be outlined in the emails. More than ever before, it’s crucial that we’re each on the same page going forward, as the future is even more unknowable than usual.
Here’s to a brighter future
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)